Can CBD test positive for drugs? We clarify your doubts

The use of CBD products to address various everyday problems has gained popularity in recent times. From regulating sleep patterns to decreasing stress and contributing to pain management, the information available on the properties of CBD is becoming more and more prevalent.

Given the boom of buying CBD online, a recurring question arises: Can CBD be detected in drug tests? This question is especially relevant in contexts such as competitive examinations, security professionals or anti-doping controls.

What is CBD and how does it show up in drug tests?

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a natural compound found in the cannabis plant(Cannabis sativa). Unlike tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the cannabinoid with psychoactive effects present in marijuana, CBD does not produce a high. In addition, both compounds have chemical differences between them.

In short, CBD does not test positive in drug tests for cannabis, as these tests specifically look for THC metabolites. But in reality things are a bit more complex than a positive or negative result. There are specific considerations and details that need to be addressed in depth, such as the THC content of some CBD products, the characteristics of the tests used, and pharmacology concepts such as “cut-off point” or “false positives”.

In addition, the particularities of a routine saliva traffic control are different from those of anti-doping tests. In this post, we will address common doubts about drug tests related to cannabis and CBD, to provide you with clear and accurate information on the subject.

What is a drug test?

A drug test is a tool used to identify the presence of psychoactive substances in the body. In general, the tests do not detect the drugs themselves, but their metabolites.

Metabolites of a drug (or of a drug in general) are the chemical compounds into which substances are broken down when they are eliminated by the body. Thus, tests are available for different drugs (cocaine, cannabis, amphetamines, MDMA…).

Under what circumstances are drug tests used?

In principle and from a theoretical point of view, drug testing is practically unnecessary. There are tests for diabetes, for pregnancy or for infectious diseases, because the subject/patient does not know if he/she is diabetic, pregnant or infected with HIV. However, the simplest and most effective way to find out whether or not a person has consumed a particular substance is to ask him or her.

On some occasions, the person is unable to provide us with this information because he or she is unconscious or very upset. Thus, the indication for drug testing is in emergency medical care.

In other circumstances, the person does not want to acknowledge drug use because of the potential negative consequences it may entail: sanction or loss of employment, traffic fines, prohibition to participate in professional sports activities… This aspect, which is sometimes debatable at the ethical level, is the one that generates the most problems and conflicts around drug testing.

Drug tests are used in a wide variety of contexts: medical care, road safety management (traffic controls), sports (anti-doping controls), judicial assessment… The techniques and procedures are highly variable depending on the purpose of the test and its field of application.

Routine blood and urine tests, such as health and preoperative checks, do not routinely include this type of test.

What types of tests are used to detect cannabis use?

There are many analytical procedures for detecting drugs in body fluids. Some are quick, inexpensive and simple to use, such as enzyme immunoassay tests (similar to the pregnancy tests available in pharmacies). Others, such as gas chromatography, involve the use of large apparatus and the need for specialized personnel.

In general, the most common types of tests are:

  1. Urine: Detection of cannabinoids in urine is the common method to assess recent or past drug use (usually THC metabolites).
  2. Saliva: Cannabis saliva tests are rapid and non-invasive. They are common in traffic controls and rapid tests. They seek to detect recent cannabis use, although in practice they cannot yet be widely used due to problems in the interpretation of results (1).
  3. Sweat: As a person sweats, cannabis metabolites may be released through the sweat glands. These patches or samples are analyzed for the presence of substance metabolites.

Others, more infrequent:

  • Hair and nails: Technically, it is possible to detect drug residues that accumulate in the hair or nails, making it possible to determine very precisely the consumption of substances in the weeks or months prior to consumption. However, these processes are extraordinarily expensive and complex and are reserved for judicial or forensic procedures.
  • Blood: Blood tests can detect many drugs in the bloodstream but, in practice, are only used in the clinical trial setting.

Detection of cannabis in drug tests

How do cannabis drug tests work?

All tests designed to detect the presence of cannabis look for metabolites of tetrahydrocannabinol or THC, responsible for the psychoactive effects of the substance. Specifically, THC-COOH (11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol acid) and 11-OH-THC (11-hydroxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol) are two of the most commonly used in both rapid saliva and urine tests (2).

The first devices to detect recent cannabis use through exhaled air are being tested (3). These instruments are similar to the breathalyzers used in routine traffic controls to detect drivers driving under the influence of alcohol.

One of the drawbacks of cannabis tests is that they provide a qualitative result (positive or negative). This does not provide information about the user’s context, consumption pattern, motivations, beliefs, experiences and problems.

What is the sensitivity of drug tests?

The sensitivity of a drug test refers to its ability to detect true positives. In other words, it measures the proportion of people who have actually used a substance and are correctly identified as positive by the test. A high sensitivity means that the test is less likely to give false negatives, i.e. to miss people who have actually used the substance in question.

Drug tests detect the presence of these compounds above a certain concentration, called a cut-off point. Samples with concentrations equal to or greater than this point will be considered positive, while those with lower concentrations will give a negative result. Therefore, the probability of testing positive for cannabis depends not only on its sensitivity, but also on the cut-off point established in the test.

However, it is important to note that as the cut-off point decreases (i.e., tests that detect the presence of drugs at lower concentrations), the number of false positives is more likely to increase. This means that some people may test positive for cannabis without having used the substance. This may be due to the presence of other factors, such as the influence of drugs, dietary supplements, drug interactions or even errors in the sample collection and processing procedure, which may contribute to false positive results.

Frequently Asked Questions about cannabis, THC, CBD and drug test results

¿El CBD puede dar un falso positivo?

El CBD se elimina a través del organismo produciendo metabolitos propios, distintos a los del THC. Así, en principio sería imposible que el uso de CBD diera un resultado positivo en un test de cannabis. Hay estudios en humanos que así lo corroboran (4) teniendo en cuenta, eso sí, que se administre CBD puro.

¿El CBD se puede convertir en THC?

En 2007 surgió cierta controversia al publicarse un estudio en animales de experimentación que demostraba la conversión del CBD a THC en una solución de jugo gástrico artificial y sus efectos psicoactivos en ratones (5). Estos datos de investigación animal no se han visto confirmados en humanos, ni siquiera utilizando métodos ultrasensibles que detectan cantidades muy bajas de THC ( 6,7).

¿Los productos de CBD Full Spectrum pueden dar positivo por THC?

El verdadero problema surge porque muchos productos de CBD contienen cantidades variables de THC. Esto plantea dudas sobre si el consumo de CBD podría resultar en un resultado positivo en una prueba de drogas. En este sentido, podemos diferenciar dos situaciones:

Productos CBD elaborados de acuerdo a la Normativa Europea, como los de Cannactiva: Estos productos de CBD pueden tener un contenido residual en THC, un máximo del 0,2% de THC en la mayoría de los países europeos. Estos productos están sometidos a procesos de control para garantizar la adecuación a la normativa legal. En esta situación, un resultado positivo a cannabis es posible a nivel teórico, pero extraordinariamente improbable en la práctica. Haría falta vaporizar varios cientos de CBD Vape Pen o e-Liquid con CBD de espectro completo a la vez para conseguir niveles detectables. Ingerir un bote entero de aceite de CBD Full Spectrum del 10% de 10 ml, implicaría la introducción de un máximo de 2 mg de THC, cantidad que difícilmente produciría efectos psicoactivos y que tampoco sería detectable a través de la mayoría de los test disponibles.

Productos no regulados: Aquellos productos caseros o no sometidos a los controles de calidad que indica la normativa pueden contener una cantidad indeterminada de THC. Los resultados de análisis de este tipo de muestras procedentes de Internet han encontrado cantidades de hasta 6 mg/ml de THC en algunos productos (8). También se han descrito intoxicaciones por THC en niños que utilizaban aceite de CBD de origen indeterminado con intención terapéutica (9).

¿Las flores de CBD pueden dar positivo para test de drogas?

Las flores de cannabis ricas en CBD podrían dar un resultado positivo en un test de drogas, dependiendo de la presencia y concentración de THC en la flor. Aunque se cultivan con el propósito de tener altos niveles de CBD y bajos de THC, aún pueden contener este último, en concentraciones variadas según el tipo de cultivo y la genética de la semilla. En los productos legales de flores de CBD, las concentraciones de THC se mantienen en límites muy bajos (por ejemplo, del 0.3% de THC), pero aún así, el consumo habitual y/o en grandes cantidades, sumado a factores como el historial previo de consumo de cannabis y particularidades individuales, técnicamente es posible dar un resultado positivo en un test de drogas. Debemos recordarte que los productos de Cannactiva no están destinados al consumo.

¿Cosméticos con CBD y cremas de CBD pueden dar positivo? 

Como ya hemos señalado, es muy poco probable que el uso de productos de CBD, incluso con trazas de THC, den lugar a un falso positivo. La probabilidad de detectar cantidades significativas de THC en saliva u orina por el contacto con la piel de cosméticos o cremas es aún más remota. Para ello habría que asumir que el THC se absorbe en cantidad suficiente por la piel, alcanza la sangre y se elimina por la saliva o la orina. En circunstancias reales esto parece imposible (10).

Tampoco las pruebas en cabello parecen afectarse por el contacto con cannabinoides:  un estudio encontró que un champú francés comercializado como CBD contenía un 10% de THC. Tres personas se lavaron el cabello diariamente con este champú durante dos semanas y, posteriormente, se analizó su cabello sin encontrar rastros de THC, CBD o cannabinol (CBN) (11).

¿Es posible dar positivo en un test de cannabis sin haber fumado, pero habiendo estado en un entorno cargado de humo de cannabis?

Una revisión sistemática de los estudios científicos realizados sobre este tema publicada en 2019 (12) llegó a la conclusión de que esta posibilidad existe. Es posible que al respirar el mismo aire que fumadores de cannabis, un no fumador pueda inhalar suficiente cantidad de metabolitos de cannabis en suspensión como para, posteriormente, dar un resultado falso positivo.

Es importante señalar que este riesgo sólo sería significativo en condiciones extremas (espacios cerrados y mal ventilados, gran exposición al humo muy concentrado durante mucho tiempo) y no es extrapolable a las situaciones más comunes en el mundo real. 

¿Cuánto tiempo permanece el THC en el cuerpo?

Todos los cannabinoides son muy afines a las grasas (lipofílicos) y se almacenan en gran medida en los tejidos grasos del cuerpo. No solo nos referimos a la “grasa abdominal” sino también al cerebro y al Sistema Nervioso Central que está compuesto, en gran medida, de lípidos. El uso habitual de cannabis trae como consecuencia la acumulación de cannabinoides en estos tejidos y una eliminación lenta de sus metabolitos. Esto no quiere decir que los cannabinoides ejerzan sus efectos psicoactivos durante tanto tiempo. 

¿Cuánto tiempo debe pasar tras consumir marihuana para no dar positivo en los test de drogas? Periodo de detección y eliminación del cannabis

Con los consumidores de cannabis habituales, es posible obtener un resultado positivo durante más de 30 días tras haber dejado de consumir, mientras que una sola exposición a cannabis en personas que no la consumen puede detectarse en la orina sólo hasta las 72 horas posteriores al consumo.

In any case, the characteristics of cannabinoids mean that there is great variability in detection times (which in exceptional cases can last up to three months). Some important factors are:

  • Body mass and fat ratio
  • Frequency of administration and amount or dose used
  • Route of administration
  • Individual metabolic differences

Products to test negative in drug tests: Do they work?

Through the Internet, it is easy to locate various types of products that supposedly allow you to obtain a negative result in drug tests. From liquids and “detox” pills to more or less original gadgets with synthetic urine.

Generally speaking, we can distinguish between saliva cleansers (sprays) and urine cleansers (diuretics). Each of these products has a method of action, often involving dilution or masking. But do they really work? In short, none of these options are effective.

Products for negative saliva test

As for sprays or saliva cleansers, there are simply no scientific references to support their efficacy. In any case, for physiological reasons, its supposed efficacy would be maintained for a few seconds after administration. Saliva tests are mostly used in traffic drug controls, so they are unlikely to be useful in practice, since the agent is present during the process.

Negative urine test products

More problematic may be the use of “urine cleansers”. They are products to be ingested orally and that ensure to accelerate the speed of drug elimination. This idea is unfounded, since under normal conditions, the speed with which a drug is eliminated from the body depends on a series of pharmacological parameters that cannot be influenced.

First, the use of diuretics (especially of undetermined origin, composition and quantity) can have serious health consequences. Secondly, urine drug screening tests are always accompanied by a basic urinalysis, which would be clearly altered by the use of diuretics (15).

Other types of “urine cleaners” are products to be added to the sample that alter the cannabis metabolites to make them undetectable. They are effective, but have the same disadvantages as those just mentioned: alterations in parameters such as pH, density or protein in the urine would make fraudulent intent evident (15, 16).

In any case, we insist again on the absence of the need to resort to cheating when consuming CBD products such as CBD oils, in the recommended doses. A positive test result for cannabis is unlikely.

CBD drug test results

Products to test negative in drug tests: Do they work?

I tested positive for cannabis after using CBD. What can I do?

As we have explained throughout this article, the likelihood of testing positive for cannabis using CBD products is unlikely. But in biology there are few things impossible and we have also pointed out that false positives are an intrinsic problem with any diagnostic test.

So, in this circumstance, the first recommendation would be to try to remember all the consumptions in the previous weeks to remember if there has been any exposure to cannabis. Am I sure I have not consumed any quantity? Am I sure that that joint I was offered last week had only CBD in it as its owner claimed?

If you are sure that you have not consumed THC and if the positive result has significant negative repercussions (disqualification from work, drug tests, legal repercussions, etc.), it is important to know that there are analytical procedures that allow precise quantification of the amounts of THC, CBD and their metabolites (16, 17). Thus, it is possible to distinguish whether the positive result can be attributed to the use of THC or CBD products. These are complex and costly procedures that are likely to involve a lengthy legal process, although the effort may be worthwhile in certain circumstances. In these cases, it is advisable to seek expert legal advice.

This article is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended to diagnose, prevent or cure any disease or symptom. Its content can complement, but never replace, the diagnosis or treatment of any disease or symptom. Cannactiva products are intended for external use. We recommend a responsible use of CBD products. Consult a professional if you have any doubts about its use.

References
  1. Dobri SCD, Moslehi AH, Davies TC. Are oral fluid testing devices effective for the roadside detection of recent cannabis use? A systematic review. Public Health. 2019 Jun;171:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 May 15. PMID: 31102828.
  2. Raouf M, Bettinger JJ, Fudin J. A Practical Guide to Urine Drug Monitoring. Fed Pract. 2018 Apr;35(4):38-44. PMID: 30766353; PMCID: PMC6368048.
  3. Ramzy V, Priefer R. THC detection in the breath. Talanta. 2021 Jan 15;222:121528. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121528. Epub 2020 Aug 11. PMID: 33167238.
  4. McCartney D, Kevin RC, Suraev AS, Irwin C, Grunstein RR, Hoyos CM, McGregor IS. Orally administered cannabidiol does not produce false-positive tests for Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol on the Securetec DrugWipe® 5S or Dräger DrugTest® 5000. Drug Test Anal. 2022 Jan;14(1):137-143. doi: 10.1002/dta.3153. Epub 2021 Aug 30. PMID: 34412166; PMCID: PMC9292716.
  5. Hart ED, Mullen L, Vikingsson S, Cone EJ, Winecker RE, Hayes ED, Flegel RR. Conversion of water-soluble CBD to ∆9-THC in synthetic gastric fluid-An unlikely cause of positive drug tests. J Anal Toxicol. 2023 Sep 15;47(7):632-635. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkad043. PMID: 37440360.
  6. Golombek P, Müller M, Barthlott I, Sproll C, Lachenmeier DW. Conversion of Cannabidiol (CBD) into Psychotropic Cannabinoids Including Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC): A Controversy in the Scientific Literature. Toxics. 2020 Jun 3;8(2):41. doi: 10.3390/toxics8020041. PMID: 32503116; PMCID: PMC7357058.
  7. Crippa JAS, Zuardi AW, Hallak JEC, Miyazawa B, Bernardo SA, Donaduzzi CM, Guzzi S, Favreto WAJ, Campos A, Queiroz MEC, Guimarães FS, da Rosa Zimmermann PM, Rechia LM, Jose Tondo Filho V, Brum Junior L. Oral Cannabidiol Does Not Convert to Δ8-THC or Δ9-THC in Humans: A Pharmacokinetic Study in Healthy Subjects. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2020 Feb 27;5(1):89-98. doi: 10.1089/can.2019.0024. PMID: 32322680; PMCID: PMC7173681.
  8. Bonn-Miller MO, Loflin MJE, Thomas BF, Marcu JP, Hyke T, Vandrey R. Labeling Accuracy of Cannabidiol Extracts Sold Online. JAMA. 2017 Nov 7;318(17):1708-1709. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11909. PMID: 29114823; PMCID: PMC5818782.
  9. Crippa JA, Crippa AC, Hallak JE, Martin-Santos R, Zuardi AW. Δ9-THC Intoxication by Cannabidiol-Enriched Cannabis Extract in Two Children with Refractory Epilepsy: Full Remission after Switching to Purified Cannabidiol. Front Pharmacol. 2016 Sep 30;7:359. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00359. PMID: 27746737; PMCID: PMC5043219.
  10. Hess C, Krämer M, Madea B. Topical application of THC containing products is not able to cause positive cannabinoid finding in blood urine. Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Mar;272:68-71. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Jan 16. PMID: 28122323.
  11. Cirimele V, Kintz P, Jamey C, Ludes B. Are cannabinoids detected in hair after washing with Cannabio shampoo? J Anal Toxicol. 1999 Sep;23(5):349-51. doi: 10.1093/jat/23.5.349. PMID: 10488922.
  12. Berthet A, De Cesare M, Favrat B, Sporkert F, Augsburger M, Thomas A, Giroud C. A systematic review of passive exposure to cannabis. Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Dec;269:97-112. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.11.017. Epub 2016 Nov 16. PMID: 27883985.
  13. Goggin MM, Janis GC. Using measured cannabidiol and tetrahydrocannabinol metabolites in urine to differentiate marijuana use from consumption of commercial cannabidiol products. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2021 Jun;59(6):506-514. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2020.1827148. Epub 2020 Oct 29. PMID: 33118434.
  14. Goggin MM, Janis GC. Using measured cannabidiol and tetrahydrocannabinol metabolites in urine to differentiate marijuana use from consumption of commercial cannabidiol products. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2021 Jun;59(6):506-514. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2020.1827148. Epub 2020 Oct 29. PMID: 33118434.
  15. Raouf M, Bettinger JJ, Fudin J. A Practical Guide to Urine Drug Monitoring. Fed Pract. 2018 Apr;35(4):38-44. PMID: 30766353; PMCID: PMC6368048.
  16. Jaffee WB, Trucco E, Levy S, Weiss RD. Is this urine really negative? A systematic review of tampering methods in urine drug screening and testing.. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007 Jul;33(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.11.008. Epub 2007 Jan 16. PMID: 17588487.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top